User Tools

Site Tools


wikistud:survey_twente2014

Satisfactory survey

Since 2008 we have asked our students to give us some feedback.

For “Real name” you can use an anonymous alias

Student's interest in in open source

<doodle twentw204j_2|2a. After one month of use Open Source tools are you still interested to use in the future?>

Yes No

</doodle>

<doodle twentw204j_3|3a. After one month of use Open Source do you see any interest and value in using Open Source tools in your current and future job ? >

The same as before Now less than before Now more than before

</doodle>

<doodle twentw2014j4|4a. After one month of use Open Source tools which one you are going to use in the future?> ^ Bash Yes ^ Bash No ^ Gdal yes ^ Gdal no ^ R yes ^ R no ^ Grass yes ^ Grass no ^ Qgis yes ^ Qgis no ^ AWK yes ^ AWK no ^ PKTOOLS yes ^ PKTOOLS no ^ </doodle>

===== Self learning ===== <doodle twentw2014j
5|5a. After one month of use Open Source do you feel able to independently learn Open Source tools? >

yes better than before yes like before no

</doodle>

<doodle twentw2014j6|6a. Have you improved in one or more of the following Open Source tools ? > ^ Bash Yes ^ Bash No ^ AWK yes ^ AWK no ^ Gdal yes ^ Gdal no ^ Grass yes ^ Grass no ^ Qgis yes ^ Qgis no ^ R yes ^ R no ^ PKTOOLS yes ^ PKTOOLS no ^ </doodle>

===== PKTOOLS ===== <doodle twentw2014j
9|PK1. Which part of the PKTOOLS would you have liked to see in more in detail?>

image filtering image subsetting/merging/compositing (pkrop/pkmosaic) image extraction (vector overlay) image classification ….

</doodle>

<doodle twentw2014j_9|PK2. Did you see potential in the use of PKTOOLS?>

Yes and I will use Yes but i will not use No ….

</doodle>

<doodle twentw2014j_9|PK3. Is the help info understandable?>

Yes Yes but need to be improved Is not understandable ….

</doodle>

How do you judge the training

<doodle twentw2014j_7|7a. Overall, how would you rate the second week of the workshop?>

Extremely Useful Very Useful Somewhat Useful Not Useful

</doodle>

<doodle twentw2014j_aa|8a. Do you think the training in second week was well adapted in respect of your needs, your skills and knowledge?>

Advanced and too difficult well adaptedbasic and boring

</doodle>

<doodle twentw2014j_10|10a. In the second week the trainer was clear and prepared?>

Very well Yes enough prepared Not enough

</doodle>

<doodle twentw2014j_11|11a. The trainer's supervision during coding exercises was satisfactory? >

Very much yes satisfactory not enough

</doodle>

Suggestions for future courses

<doodle twentw2014j_11|12a. If you were going to re-attend the course you will opt for which one of the time slot? >

Only one week Two consecutive weeks Two weeks with one month of self learning

</doodle>

<doodle twentw2014j_11|12a. If we organize a course in advance programming (parallel process, working in tiles, C++ language) would you like to attend it? >

Yes but only 2 days Yes but only 3 days Yes but only 4 days Yes but only 5 Not at all

</doodle>

<doodle twentw2014j_11|12a. In the course the two sections “listening/doing pre-existing exercises” and “working by your self” was correctly balanced? >

Yes, well balance No, I would like more time for working with my data No, I would like more time for doing pre-existing exercises

</doodle>

wikistud/survey_twente2014.txt · Last modified: 2017/12/05 22:53 (external edit)